Log rule · 1906

International ¼-inch Log Rule

Judson Clark's International ¼-inch rule (1906) is widely considered the most accurate log-to-lumber predictor for modern band-saw mills. It divides the log into 4-foot segments and models taper — unlike Doyle or Scribner.

Calculate Now ↓

International ¼" processes the log as 4-foot segments with taper: each successive segment loses ½ inch of diameter. Modern band-mill overrun on International is typically under 5% — the most accurate prediction of the three major rules.

Formula

The International ¼-inch Formula

For each 4-foot segment of a log:

BF_segment = 0.22 D² − 0.71 D

Where D is the diameter (inside bark) at the small end of that segment. Successive segments add ½" of diameter (moving up the taper). The formula assumes a ¼-inch saw kerf and a 6% shrinkage allowance — hence "¼-inch" in the name.

Worked example (16" × 16-ft log)

Break into four 4-ft segments. Small end = 16"; next up = 16.5"; next = 17"; largest = 17.5":

  • Seg 1 (D=16): 0.22×256 − 0.71×16 = 56.32 − 11.36 = 44.96 BF
  • Seg 2 (D=16.5): 0.22×272.25 − 0.71×16.5 = 59.90 − 11.72 = 48.18 BF
  • Seg 3 (D=17): 0.22×289 − 0.71×17 = 63.58 − 12.07 = 51.51 BF
  • Seg 4 (D=17.5): 0.22×306.25 − 0.71×17.5 = 67.38 − 12.43 = 54.95 BF
  • Total: ~200 BF International ¼"

(Published tables typically round this to 180 BF for a 16" × 16-ft log; the difference comes from segment-by-segment table lookups vs. formula computation.)

Full Table

International ¼-inch BF Table (Standard ½" Taper)

SED (in)8 ft10 ft12 ft14 ft16 ft18 ft20 ft
825324047556372
10405060708090100
12607590105120135150
1485105130150175195220
16115145175205235265295
18150190230270310350390
20195245295345395445495
24295370445520595670745
284155206257308359401,045
325556958359751,1151,2551,395
Comparison

International vs Doyle vs Scribner

For the same 16" × 16-ft log:

RuleBFvs Actual Yield
Doyle144~25% low (overrun)
Scribner166~10% low
International ¼-inch180within 2-5% of actual sawn
Actual sawn (modern band mill)~185

The gap widens on smaller logs: for a 10" × 16-ft log, Doyle predicts 36 BF vs International's 80 BF — a 120% difference driven entirely by which rule you use.

Usage

Where International ¼" Is Used

  • Northeast US / Appalachia — Vermont through Georgia, hardwood-heavy region.
  • USDA Forest Service inventories — most FIA (Forest Inventory Analysis) data uses International.
  • Academic and research forestry — the preferred scale when accuracy matters.
  • Modern band-sawmill contracts — some sellers negotiate International-only pricing to avoid Doyle-driven mill overrun.
FAQ

International ¼-inch FAQ

Who invented the International rule?

Judson F. Clark in 1906, in Ontario. The rule was refined for US use and standardized as "International ¼-inch" (matching typical band-saw kerf).

Why is it the most accurate?

Because it accounts for taper (unlike Scribner) and uses a modern kerf assumption (unlike Doyle's over-conservative deduction). On a well-formed log sawn on a band mill, International predicts within 5% of actual yield.

What's the ⅛-inch variant?

Same underlying method but assumes ⅛-inch kerf (extremely thin blade). Rare in commercial use; produces ~7% higher BF than the ¼-inch version.

Should I always use International if it's most accurate?

Depends on your buyer/seller. Every scale is legally valid; use whatever the contract specifies. International is best when you're paying for what actually comes out of the log.

Does it work for softwood too?

Yes — International handles softwood well, though softwood mills often quote in ⅛-inch or in cubic scale (m³) rather than board feet.

How is the ½-inch taper chosen?

It's an average for hardwood species over their merchantable stem length. Fast-growing softwood may taper less; over-mature hardwood more. Adjust in the calculator for atypical logs.